Monday, 16 January 2012
Can You Still Support?
The question is, can you still support Assads' murderous tyrannical regime with all this happening? Believe it or not, there are still people that do...
The Free Syrian Army is Real
A couple of times I have seen commentators on different news channels saying that the free Syrian Army doesn't really exist or is hyped up and is not wide spread as people may think. But there has been alot recently that suggests otherwise.
Even though, it is true that the members of this newly formed "Free Syrian Army" are not well equiped and probably are less experienced and less trained than Assads 4th division and Special forces units (that are the most loyal to this regime) they are definitely more motivated and a stronger belief in the rightuousness of their struggle. This is evident when we consider that it took Assads forces more than a week before they were able to enter certain areas of Homs.
Today Assads' army is bombarding towns and of Zabadani and Madaya located in the Suburbs of Damascus. This has been going on for nearly 4 days now and still Assads' army has not been able to enter those areas. Even though it is said that this campaign is being conducted by Assads' elite 4th division led by First Lieutenant Abo Abdo, Mahers' right hand and operations commander. The following video shows fighters of the Free Syrian Army in Zabadani.
Sunday, 30 October 2011
On Haykals' Interview
On Aljazeera last night there was an interview with Mohammad Hassanain Haykal. He talked about the Arab Spring and shared some of his thoughts on what is happening. I agreed with most of the things he said regarding Syria, how the middle classes in Syria (mostly in Damascus and Aleppo) are still quiet as they consider what has happened in Libya and Iraq and so on, and being able to persuade those middle classes to fully join the uprising will be the decisive point of the uprising. He also mentioned how the revolution should not be rushed by seeking foreign intervention (like in Libya) and that the revolution should mature in order for it to be successful.
He obviously looked down on the foreign intervention in Libya and said that it was a black period of the Arab spring (or something along those lines) as it didn't come from the people, which I would have agreed with if Qaddafi didn't plan on eliminating two thirds of the population of Libya.
One thing I found a bit inaccurate was when he said that most of the protests in Syria are happening in cities and towns that are on the borders. He talked about what happened in Jisr Al Shughour, and hinted at Dera'a where the spark to the revolution took place and how close it is to the Jordanian border and threw in there a possibility of Jordanian secret service involvement in what has happened in Dera'a.
The problem is that most cities and towns in Syria are close to some border, even Damascus and Aleppo are close to the Lebanese and Turkish borders respectively. I don't think that that is an argument that can be made so as to show that there was foreign involvement in the uprising. And even though Damascus and Aleppo are close to borders there are no mass demonstrations taking place. Take for example Der il Zor, which is more inland, that city had alot of protests before the military clamp down. The only factor that determines the size of protests in cities and towns is the presence of security not anything else. For example, during the month before ramadan when Hama was security free, there were protests everyday and on Friday's the protests would be in the hundreds of thousands. For an entire month not one person was martyred and not one was even injured.
If three quarters of the cities in Syria are close to the border then the probability that protests will happen in some of those cities is high. Lets not forget that what happened in Dera'a, the spark to all this was a response by the people to the injustice their own children were put through and the humiliating and barbaric treatment that the families of those children received by regime officials at the time for protesting the ill treatment their children received by security forces. I don't see how foreign powers could have caused this in any way. Not to say that Haykal didn't admit that the demands and grievances of the people of Syria are not legitimate but he could have gone just a bit towards the governments story of events.
Nevertheless, it was a good interview and the he did have some important points about the revolutions in different Arab countries especially about Yemen that I found interesting. Watch it if you can.
Rallies and Vocal Chords
I
think I ripped my vocal chords apart today with the excessive screaming
that I did. And yes, it was about the uprising in Syria. So let me dive
into the subject without much introducing myself and how I'm physically
feeling.
So
today was the "Family tree of Syria" event or better officially labeled
as a 'carnival' that was being planned by the regime since the Arab
league decided to send its envoy to Damascus to find a solution to the
uprising in Syria. It was undeniable that a lot of people joined the
'carnival' and I had no problem watching it, just to get a couple of
laughs you know.
Because If you live in Syria and follow what the regime and those that
support it have said in the past and compare it to such events you
instantly notice how contradictory these people are. Anyways, I decided
to stay home today since the opposition called for a general strike and spend some time watching the news and doing some blogging I thought. Until some family members came around while I was watching
TV.. not a good moment, because as soon as they did (they are
pro-regime.. actually I don’t know what they are exactly, one day they
are here the next there?? ), they start cheering and saying things like
"see all these people all Syria supports regime" and "the Zionist
conspiracy has been defeated today, Americas plans won't happen after
this, We won today, look at all these people!!"
For me that is fine, I don’t mind people having a different
opinion even if to me that opinion or position they take is unethical
and immoral but when people don't have the correct picture about what is
happening, when they are deluded and receive very little information
about what is happening in the rest of the country, I don't blame them.
What gets me is when those people start
accusing those protesters saying they are traitors and basically
worthless people who deserve to die. That is when I lose it. I start
screaming like there was no tomorrow.
How
can anyone accuse these people that are going out knowingly putting
their lives at risk so that other Syrians might, just might one day be
able to live a better life, one that is better than they would have ever
hoped for. How is it that those protesting to defend their honour and families honour from the criminal acts that this regime is imposing on them deserve to die?
Those people that have been martyred should all be considered nothing
less than heroes, and their heroic acts to liberate this country from
this intolerant, unjust and murderous regime should be and will always
be remembered. The likes of Ghiath Matar, who during protests used to go up to security army personnel in Daraya
and give them water as a gesture of good will and later used to give
out flowers, how can this person be worthless? The likes of Hamza Al Khateb, a child with a conscious that went out with members of his town to provide people in a sieged town of Dera'a with food and was arrested and tortured to death, how is he worthless and deserves to die? All those children that have been killed the likes of Hajer Al Khateeb and the
other 100+ children are they worthless? Today three more children were
killed in Syria, one of them is called Catherine from Homs, I think she
was 4 years old or younger. Worthless?
I
can't understand these people. They know that the regime is killing but
they refuse to say anything about it or take a position against it.
Maybe its because they fear the unknown, these people that support the regime have things to lose, they want to feel safe and the only way
to feel safe, the only way they believe will keep them living is if
this regime stays. They don't care if members of this regime are
stealing the wealth of the Syrian people and spending it on living
lavishly, I was told its better that a "Syrian" is stealing the peoples
wealth than a foreign state.
So
there are a lot of people that are controlled by fear but is that
enough, is fear alone enough to make you defend a regime that is killing
other people just so that a couple of people can remain in power? Not
really. If you are afraid you wouldn't publicly admit that you don’t
support the regime, but when your around people you trust why not admit
that you don’t support the regime?
For
this I have two explanations the first one being is that these people
are genuinely ignorant of what is going on like I said earlier they
don't get the information for them to form the right picture of what is
happening. Or, they have
become used to following directions that to break out of the shackles
and to think freely scares them. If you watched the rally today you can
see that even though, and after eight months of protests calling for the
end of a regime where one man rules all, both the regime and its
supporters are still saying "Bashar is our leader forever" and that it self is stupid and as I said earlier also contradicts what the regime has been talking about like, reform. So, these people have
been programmed to think that there is only one person, and one person
alone who is able to run this country, one person alone that is able to
maintain peace in it and stop it from falling into civil/sectarian wars,
and that just happens to be an eye doctor who had a crash course in the
military probably becoming the fastest high ranked officer in the world
(6 years to become General) who
only came back to Syria from the UK because his older brother died and
so he was next in line to rule because the second oldest son was seen
even by his father, as too moronic and savage to rule. Yes, the perfect person for such a job even for someone who didn’t want to live in this country in the first place.
There is a good documentary to watch called Tufan Fe Bilad
Al Ba'ath (Flood in Baath Country) which shows how the education system
in Syria instills these ideas that the ruling party is so great and
that our leader is eternal and what not.
These ideas that have been instilled into the people have
completely sealed off and locked down any notion these people might get
that there could be an alternative. And thus, you will find people
saying "no one better will come if he (basher) goes". But there have
been times that I've seen pro-regime supporters escape for a while, when
they feel that their conscious can no longer take it and start to speak
freely. The next day they come back as if nothing they said a day
earlier has ever been said, they apparently have this ability to self
suppress any ideas they may get that this regime is doing things that
they need to be held accountable for.
They quickly revert and start saying "No,
this regime is fighting terrorists that have come from all borders
Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey and Iraq and are being financed by Bandar Bin
Sultan, Hariri, Turkey, Qatar, Aljazeera, Saudi Arabia with billions of
dollars and they get the most advanced weapons like laser guns, and they are killing people, because Condaleza Rice said there is a new middle east and regime stood against it, that’s why they made a command center in Hamburg that is leading the protests in the streets, and even Batman is in on this…" ??
Seriously,
this conspiracy thing is going way out of control, people need to
understand that there will always be plans by the west to dominate this
region one way or another, it has never stopped and probably will never
stop. These countries have interests, and they will do what is necessary
to reach their aims. The problem is not that these western nations have
plans to dominate, the problem is when WE don't have a plan to become
strong enough to fight off those plans without having to depend on
others to stand by us (Iran) and without having bargaining chips that we can use with the west to ease off pressure and get what we want like Hizbullah, Hamas, PKK, etc.
I've gone way out of the topic but its all relevant. However this could have been two or three posts even. Nevermind that, this is probably the only time I'm going to have for a while to write this.
So
carrying on with the story I first started with. After ripping apart my
vocal chords, I decided to leave the house and go to the office. So off I went,
drove past a checkpoint and was going towards the city, only to find
out that all entrances to it were sealed off. I ask a police officer how
I can get in, he just points towards the other side. So I drive to the
other side and to another entrance but it was also sealed off. There,
was a man obviously frustrated at not being allowed in, lost it and cursed the
police man who was talking to him, the police man shouts at the man
with the very famous coastal accent "go away or I'll shoot you right
now". The man freezes, looks at the policeman and says "Do it". At that
point I still didn’t grasp what was going on, I was watching but also
being still angry at the earlier argument
I had, and the fact that I didn’t have much fuel in the car and trying
to figure out how to get to the office, all this was distracting me. I
think if I wasn't distracted I would have gone out and picked a fight with the policeman.
Tuesday, 4 October 2011
I Support the SNC
I couldn't have been happier today after hearing that the Syrian National Council has been finally formed head by Burhan Ghalioun, who I honestly haven't heard of before the start of the Syrian revolution. So obviously for now I and many other Syrians will be supporting this council, and although it is not representative of all the political parties and other entities in Syria it does represent (according to Mr. Burhan) nearly 80% of all Syrian entities whether political or ethnic.
Following my last post titled "The Way Forward" which points out how the Syrian revolution needs to take a different path than its counter parts in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya by properly planning the steps taken by those in the forefront of the revolution to ensure a transitional phase that will actually be able to accomplish the aims of the revolution, with much less obstacles as compared to other revolutions. I advise you guys to read it, it’s a pretty good read, if you do rush to read it please ignore the typos, And! Maybe you could leave a comment or rate it or something.. you know.
In relation to that previous post I think this National Council will be able to eliminate any uncertainties and fear of the unknown that the silent majority has, and will (if the council does its job properly) create more backing for the revolution from people that are still undecided or those that are currently pro-regime but have been growing tired of the situation.
In any case, what I would like to see from this Syrian National Council next is an action plan and mechanisms by which they will ensure the revolution is successful in toppling the regime (which has been stated as the aim of the council) and the way this council will carry out the transitional phase from a dictatorial regime to a regime that is representative of all the people. What I would also like to see is that the National Council allows other entities that have been formed to support the Syrian revolution or Syrian political parties or Syrian organizations from different backgrounds the ability to take part in the council. According to Mohammad Al Oudat, A Syrian Journalist, 15 political parties within Syria are not represented in the council.
That said, a lot of the people that support the revolution in Syria have decided to support the Council for the time being but have stated that they won't raise their hopes too high and will be watching the steps the council take very closely. It is very possible that this council will lose a lot of its internal support and thus credibility if it carries out things that people believe to be in the wrong direction or are counter-productive. Anything like arguments that break out in the council for any reason that is thought to be insignificant, or making the wrong decisions for example agreeing to hold talks with the current regime or accepting any foreign military intervention or taking the liberty to act on behalf of the revolutionaries rather than acting as a tool to support the revolution.
In any case the Syrian National Council has finally been formed and I support it because for the time being it is the only alternative available.
Saturday, 17 September 2011
What Could Have Been for Bashar
When you look back at things you realize so much could have gone differently, and it would have all been so much better if people did certain things rather than what they already have done. If only people can see the consequences of their actions..
I was just thinking to myself, if Bashar Al Assad took a different path to the one he choose, how would have things been different? If he actually listened to the people, implemented proper and real reforms, if he gave people their rights and treated the situation in Dera'a differently, for example if he brought those that were responsible for detaining and torturing the children in Dera'a to Trial, things wouldn't have been where they are now. Instead of being viewed as a criminal and murder by Syrians and a tyrannical and oppressive leader by the rest of the world he would have been viewed as the only president in the Arab world that could really make a difference, the president that the people of the region have been waiting for. His popularity in Syria and the 'Arab World' would have increased to unprecedented levels for any Arab leader in our contemporary history.
In contrast, Bashar and his regime were truly viewed as the only regime that was standing by the rights of the people of the region and fighting for the aspirations and rights of Arabs and Palestine. I can almost certainly say that if he implemented reform by changing the constitution and erasing the 8th article of it, if he truly implemented a law for the formation of political parties and held free and fair elections and worked on the next two years in implementing serious social and economical reform he would have not only won (fairly) the elections in two years time, but he would have probably won the elections for years to come.
Instead Bashar and his regime took the longer version of the same wrong path that other Arab dictators have taken. How and when this regime will fall all now depends on a number of factors, mainly where the loyalty of the members of his regime (especially the military) will shift to in the coming days; I say days knowing that I'm being very optimistic. What a chance he has been given, an opportunity, instead this regime dealt with it not as an opportunity but as a threat that needs to be dealt with by force.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)